Pitt’s petition shows he is “clinging to this private judge who exhibited bias and refused statutorily required evidence,” Olson said, adding, “It is disturbing that in full knowledge of unethical behavior, and having previously failed to disclose their new and ongoing financial relationships with him, Mr. Pitt’s counsel would seek to reinstate the private judge.”
Jolie hopes Pitt will “join her in focusing on the children’s needs, voices, and healing,” according to Olson.
In the ruling from the appeals court, three judges determined that “Ouderkirk’s ethical breach,” along with information about his alleged connection to Pitt’s lawyers, allow one to “reasonably to entertain a doubt as to the judge’s ability to be impartial.” They wrote, “Disqualification is required.”
Per the ruling, Ouderkirk said he “made all required disclosures in a timely manner at the time of his initial appointment.”
(This story was originally posted on Wednesday, Sept. 1, 2021, at 7:02 p.m. PT)
